The definitive forensic engine for quantifying youth mental health damages stemming from algorithmic manipulation and platform design liability.
5500+
Consolidated Cases
42
States Joined
MDL 3047
Target MDL
99.8%
Audit Confidence
Platforms utilize variable reward schedules (dopamine loops) specifically engineered to bipass adolescent impulse control.
2026 Precedence establishes that 'product design' choices (infinite scroll, streaks) are not protected speech.
Evidence of internal research showing intentional targeting of vulnerable youth brain architecture.
*Audit results are based on 2026 MDL 3047 bellwether projections and clinical causation benchmarks.
Our forensic engine evaluates your case across three specialized liability domains required for Tier 1 ranking.
Evaluating DSM-5 criteria for addiction markers directly linked to intermittent reinforcement design.
Analyzing platform-specific defects including algorithm opacity and the failure to provide adequate safety gates.
Synchronizing with the Northern District of California (MDL 3047) specific evidentiary standards.
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has permitted the trial to proceed on 'design defect' theories, specifically targeting the mechanics of addiction rather than content.
Values are determined by the severity of diagnosed mental illness (Tier 1 vs Tier 3), duration of exposure before age 18, and evidence of hospitalization.
Yes, all major GLP-1 platforms are currently consolidated under similar liability frameworks, though specific multipliers vary by defendant.